Residential (single & multifamily) Building Permits by Place
Below are comparisons of building activity in Central Oregon relative to other metro areas in Oregon and other Western metros that compete on either a lifestyle or economic development basis. In the tri-county area of Central Oregon, building permit activity through 2007 was strongest in Deschutes County. 2008 and 2009 have experienced a marked decline in building permit activity, although not at a standstill.
| Building Permits in Central Oregon |
| Area |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
Thru Q2 2009
|
| Deschutes County |
1,980 |
2,140 |
2,268 |
2,268 |
3,366 |
4,002 |
3,137 |
1,613 |
682 |
179 |
| - Bend |
892 |
1,014 |
1,246 |
1,331 |
1,801 |
2,142 |
1,566 |
790 |
289 |
81 |
| - Redmond |
360 |
481 |
397 |
516 |
725 |
841 |
537 |
285 |
142 |
31 |
| - Sisters |
11 |
23 |
29 |
16 |
24 |
81 |
90 |
62 |
24 |
3 |
| Crook County |
203 |
203 |
172 |
219 |
289 |
341 |
356 |
169 |
71 |
NA |
| Jefferson County |
207 |
176 |
97 |
111 |
122 |
235 |
117 |
42 |
35 |
NA |
| Tri-County Total |
2,390 |
2,519 |
2,437 |
2,598 |
3,777 |
4,578 |
3,610 |
1,824 |
788 |
NA |
Sources: US Census Bureau (Annual New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits).In some instances, Census Bureau figures are lower
than what local county planning departments report but are used for comparability. Crook and Jefferson Counties report annual numbers but
not monthly numbers to the Census Bureau.
Central Oregon Compared to Other Cities in Oregon
Relative to other metro areas in Oregon, Central Oregon had the highest rate of building permits in 2007, on both an absolute basis as well as on a per-thousand-population basis.
| Central Oregon Building Permits Compared to Other Areas in Oregon |
| Areas |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
Thru Q2 2009 |
| Central Oregon |
2,275 |
2,382 |
2,441 |
2,466 |
3,618 |
4,346 |
3,323 |
1,824 |
788 |
197* |
| Hillsboro |
649 |
545 |
708 |
785 |
697 |
882 |
1,065 |
574 |
199 |
88 |
| Medford |
289 |
369 |
453 |
711 |
625 |
604 |
443 |
370 |
107 |
74 |
| Salem |
538 |
556 |
659 |
679 |
702 |
867 |
633 |
581 |
283 |
83 |
| Gresham |
352 |
487 |
484 |
448 |
397 |
382 |
255 |
323 |
119 |
54 |
| Beaverton |
244 |
408 |
429 |
262 |
468 |
344 |
252 |
222 |
208 |
133 |
| Portland |
959 |
1,142 |
1,198 |
1,291 |
1,117 |
1,117 |
1,420 |
1,384 |
721 |
229 |
| Eugene |
643 |
656 |
693 |
578 |
624 |
812 |
557 |
327 |
193 |
63 |
Sources: US Census Bureau (Annual New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits). In some instances, Census Bureau figures are
lower than what local county planning departments report but are used for comparability.
* Central Oregon number does not include not reporting areas - unincorporated Crook County or City of Madras in Jefferson County.
Central Oregon Compared to Other western cities
Among other cities in the Western U.S., Central Oregon has had one of the highest levels of building activity. Even though building permits have dropped off considerably from the peak in 2004, activity level in the tri-county area has outpaced other cities the region is frequently compared to.
| Central Oregon Building Permits Compared to Select Western Cities |
| County |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
| Central Oregon |
2275 |
2382 |
2441 |
2446 |
3618 |
4346 |
3323 |
1824 |
788 |
| Boise ID |
1059 |
924 |
817 |
807 |
732 |
1049 |
699 |
578 |
205 |
| Coeur d’ Alene, ID |
329 |
331 |
340 |
381 |
642 |
695 |
322 |
301 |
230 |
| Spokane, WA |
257 |
362 |
394 |
561 |
602 |
748 |
574 |
426 |
200 |
| Bellingham, WA |
329 |
329 |
284 |
326 |
401 |
263 |
158 |
245 |
76 |
| Salt Lake City, UT |
219 |
221 |
150 |
115 |
97 |
125 |
123 |
78 |
48 |
| St. George, UT |
635 |
831 |
1029 |
1367 |
1680 |
1652 |
944 |
767 |
299 |
| Cedar City, UT |
143 |
128 |
167 |
199 |
333 |
612 |
529 |
283 |
160 |
| Reno, NV |
1360 |
1490 |
1485 |
1878 |
2914 |
2989 |
1527 |
1008 |
692 |
| Sparks, NV |
887 |
1154 |
1066 |
1350 |
987 |
1322 |
1128 |
616 |
153 |
| Carson City, NV |
276 |
323 |
313 |
199 |
144 |
117 |
120 |
47 |
16 |
| Boulder, CO |
115 |
60 |
88 |
99 |
92 |
90 |
71 |
57 |
118 |
| Ft. Collins, CO |
1059 |
1170 |
1262 |
1051 |
1058 |
775 |
491 |
431 |
303 |
| Folsom, CA |
1243 |
940 |
627 |
741 |
770 |
567 |
493 |
20 |
126 |
| Redding, CA |
469 |
511 |
612 |
489 |
390 |
753 |
371 |
14 |
197 |
| Flagstaff,AZ |
260 |
491 |
470 |
468 |
320 |
379 |
435 |
175 |
106 |
| Prescott, AZ |
475 |
527 |
658 |
630 |
672 |
619 |
536 |
225 |
117 |
| Missoula, MT |
338 |
312 |
506 |
520 |
426 |
477 |
337 |
310 |
201 |
| Bozeman, MT |
268 |
298 |
339 |
415 |
454 |
481 |
385 |
369 |
160 |
|
Sources: US Census Bureau (Annual New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits) and Portland State University Population Research Center.
In some instances, Census Bureau figures are lower than what local county planning departments report but are used for comparability.
In the Publications section, EDCO Profiles and Data - Demographic, Consumer Expenditure, and Business/Workforce from Oregon Prospector may be helpful.